This article’s lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Conversations regarding eating bear meat ethics of eating meat are focused on whether or not it is moral to eat non-human animals. Ultimately, this is a debate that has been ongoing for millennia, and it remains one of the most prominent topics in food ethics.
People who abstain from eating meat are generally known as “vegetarians” or “vegans. Ethical omnivores” are individuals who object to the practices underlying the production of meat, as opposed to the act of consuming meat itself. Conversations regarding the ethics of meat eating have been ongoing for thousands of years, possibly longer. Pythagoras, a Greek mathematician and philosopher who lived during the 6th century BC, made the case against eating animals on grounds of their having souls like humans. Aye, and when others pray for a good wheat harvest, he, presumably, would pray for a good meat supply. The young man, guessing that these remarks of Socrates applied to him, did not stop eating his meat, but took some bread with it. Watch the fellow, you who are near him, and see whether he treats the bread as his meat or the meat as his bread.
Rene Descartes, a 17th-century French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist, disagreed with the aforementioned stances. He argued that animals were not conscious. As a result, he asserted that there is nothing ethically wrong with consuming meat or causing animals physical pain. Many other modern thinkers have questioned the morality not only of the double standard underlying speciesism but also the double standard underlying the fact that people support treatment of cows, pigs, and chickens in ways that they would never allow with pet dogs, cats, or birds. Ethical vegetarians say that the reasons for not hurting or killing animals are similar to the reasons for not hurting or killing humans.